http://www.founditemclothing.com/itgoesto11/wp- content/uploads/2013/10/80s-hair.jpg |
80's hairstyles are extremely bulky, and prevail hair combed to one side or the hairstyles with hair in front shorter than the back.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia /en/9/9c/Margaret_Thatcher_cropped.jpg |
With her rise to power came changes of image and appearence. Margaret Thatcher showed her allegiance to the attitudes and look of her class by her epousal of the shampoo and set-style. A look that had much in common withe the one of the Queen, a kind of anti-fashion way of hair-styling used as a way of signalling immutability of the monarchy, it's resistance to change and its longevity and tradition. Her fixed appearence mekes her feel secure and sets herself outside the parameters of fashion.
For Mrs Thatcher the hair, especially an abundance of hair had traditional association with feminity, particularly backcombed- signified a partticular brand of domesticated feminity. This is the idea based on which she broke the rules. The large,heavily set and sprayed style gave the illusion of a hard helmet and steadfastly situated her within the culture rather than nature.
This bigness of hair on men had a particular traditional association with power and has existed as a status symbol for centuries (the hair od Louis XIV can be taken as example). It seemed the more important the public office a woman held the more important became the hair in taking space around the body.
http://media-2.web.britannica.com/eb -media/75/117375-004-F79CE7D4.jpg |
http://images.sodahead.com/polls/000376739/polls_Bon_Jovi_Publicity_ Print_322064_3802_368257_answer_6_xlarge.jpeg |
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/9e/3 ì1/a0/9e31a092f4929c54334415e6bdad2ec0.jpg |
In the 1980's the was a rise of the number of women entering the workforce, some in even in positions of executive power. Countless articles began to appear on the subject of the appropriate appearence for the woman at work. Especially the Blunt cut became (and still remains) a signiture look of the professional woman, the image of competence and seriousness. What this look was designe to do is to send men a clear message: " I am here as your colleague, as your equal and I can do what you can do, and maybe even better". Women needed a way of declaring their intentions and their "dress for success" fit perfectly the bill. A kind of high contrast was a standart in this case: broad shouldered, a little severe and perfectly disciplined. This look was created to say: " Put away your stereotypes about women being flighty, emotional and undependable. Women are now ready for the demands of the corporate world". This is not to say that the corporate woman of the 1980's was not sexual. More than this, she was frequently utterly sexual. But there was a clear message in place: " Let us attend the affairs of the world, before we consider those of the heart".
Most men said that they got the intended message of this cut- loud an clear. The hair tells them that the wearer wants men to honour her as a colleague before they respond to her sexuality. But it is difficult cut for a sexist men, and this is the reason why other men find this a "practical" cut. For them this is a kind of cut worn by women who have married and settled down. They would say that these women are no more subjects of sensuality and vanity.
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-l8kiGW3AA_M /UZs7ljrTSwI/AAAAAAAAALI/_fZnLZpY C94/s640/80s-long-blonde-haircut.jpg |
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/47/82/ 3e/47823e5b5c1b79b9fa4a013c9af7838e.jpg |
https://insidethelifeofmoi.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/hair-bad.jpg |
Reference: Book- Good hair days. A history of british hairstyling by Caroline Cox
Book- Big Hair. A journeyinto the transformation of self by Grant McCracken
No comments:
Post a Comment